food miles
Local Solutions Not Suitable for Global Issues
From an editorial of the same tttle by William Falk in the current issue of The Week:
To accurately calculate a product’s carbon impact, they found, you have to go beyond “food miles”—the distance that kiwi or artichoke-flecked sausage traveled before reaching your table—and figure in how much fertilizer, transported water, electricity, and other energy was used to produce it. Lamb raised on New Zealand’s sunnier, grassier hills and shipped 11,000 miles to Britain, the study found, produced a mere 1,520 pounds of carbon emissions per ton. “Local” British lamb, which requires more intensive care, produced 6,280 pounds—four times as much. As if that heresy were not upsetting enough, a British scientist has calculated that walking to the store contributes more to global warming than driving a car. Walking, it seems, burns calories, which have to be replaced by eating food. And producing food—especially beef and dairy products—is more carbon-intensive than burning a smidgen of gasoline, particularly since ruminating cattle emit so much methane.


Recent comments
3 years 28 weeks ago
3 years 40 weeks ago
3 years 42 weeks ago
3 years 49 weeks ago
3 years 50 weeks ago
3 years 50 weeks ago
3 years 50 weeks ago
4 years 2 weeks ago
4 years 2 weeks ago
4 years 3 weeks ago