<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.conversationamongfriends.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Conversation Among Friends - materialism - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.conversationamongfriends.org/taxonomy/term/103</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;materialism&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>delusional?</title>
 <link>http://www.conversationamongfriends.org/god-delusions#comment-329</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
JS - i looked at the reviews of the d&amp;#39;souza book, and it sounds like he falls *splat* on his face when it comes to arguing science. reading the one-star reviews on amazon is revealing. ow! which may be a really bad idea when you&amp;#39;re trying to vy for supremacy with a bunch of scientists? i am afraid well intentioned, but uninformed defence of the faith may play strongly into the hands of those with bad intent. that&amp;#39;s why i&amp;#39;m so keen on getting myself well prepared.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
the other book, however, i think is really worth reading. it&amp;#39;s in my shopping cart now &lt;img src=&quot;/modules/smileys/packs/example/smile.png&quot; title=&quot;Smiling&quot; alt=&quot;Smiling&quot; /&gt; thanks for the pointer. keep it up!
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
pm 
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 10:50:46 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 329 at http://www.conversationamongfriends.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Discusson about ranting atheists</title>
 <link>http://www.conversationamongfriends.org/god-delusions#comment-322</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
PM,
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
FYI, I think this book by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/Whats-So-Great-About-Christianity/dp/1596985178/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1198876126&amp;amp;sr=1-1&quot;&gt;Dinesh D&amp;#39;Souza&lt;/a&gt; is an attempt to respond to Dawkins and company.   This looks like an excellent response.  One reviewer summarizes each chapter on Amazon. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
js
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;#160;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Oops, I was actually thinking of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/Dawkins-Delusion-Atheist-Fundamentalism-Denial/dp/083083446X/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1199070430&amp;amp;sr=8-1&quot;&gt;Dawkins Delusion&lt;/a&gt;.  The link will get you there.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 22:09:54 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Joey</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 322 at http://www.conversationamongfriends.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>so....</title>
 <link>http://www.conversationamongfriends.org/hans-kueng#comment-315</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;??&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 13:32:53 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 315 at http://www.conversationamongfriends.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Keung on PBXVI</title>
 <link>http://www.conversationamongfriends.org/hans-kueng#comment-314</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
PM,
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
From Wed-13-Sept-06:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Tuebingen, Germany- Hans Kueng, the Swiss-born Catholic theologian who has been a long-time critic of the Vatican, slammed Pope Benedict XVI on Wednesday for not offering dialogue during a six-day visit to Germany. There had not been &amp;quot;a single future-oriented signal&amp;quot; from the pope, nor were there any suggestions of reforms on the way, Kueng told Deutsche Presse-Agentur dpa in an interview. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kueng, who was invited to a long lunch and talk with Benedict in Italy last year, said the visit had made a contradictory impression. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;He didn&amp;#39;t fulfil any of the hopes of reform-oriented Catholics. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;But on a personal level, he made a nice impression and was on the wavelength of the faithful. He&amp;#39;s not a media pope with acting talent trying to pull in applause. Rather he is someone who concentrates on the central truth of Christianity, belief in God,&amp;quot; he said. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Speaking at his home in Tuebingen, Germany, the retired theologian said Benedict had been &amp;quot;tactically smart to stay silent about the rule of celibacy for priests, or the ban on contraceptives and other uncomfortable Roman rules. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;He was always stressing the nice side of faith and the church and leaving the harsh church rules that still exist unmentioned.&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kueng added, &amp;quot;I don&amp;#39;t see dialogue in practice.&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Asked how he judged the one-year-old Benedict papacy, Kueng said, &amp;quot;His trademark is still unclear. But I still hope that the pope will manage to leave behind the dark shadows of the former doctrine watchdog and offer constructive solutions for the church and ecumenism.&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kueng said theologians had offered the Vatican many ways of letting Protestants share in the Catholic communion ceremony and said, &amp;quot;It&amp;#39;s up to the pope to act.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 10:28:57 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Joey</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 314 at http://www.conversationamongfriends.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

